Since the Japan Nuclear crisis many Americans are logging on to available radiation monitoring sites, there are actually quite a few. After a few days I realized there were major spikes occurring in the Denver Colorado area, although no exi...sting nuclear facilities were listed for that area. My interest was piqued and my focus for some time was monitoring the Denver spikes, screen capturing high CPM levels. I was still in the early stages a very investigating history of the Rocky Flats Nuclear weapons facility that was located there, and Denver is still another very interesting story, but this new information I came across may be far more important, especially for North Carolina.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
You'll figure it out, you click a dark blue balloon and you get the latest radiation data for that monitor. Click a few balloons to get familiar,
you will see the normal range is anywhere from 5 -60> The CPM "alarm" level is anything over 100 (130 on some sites). Click the Raleigh NC Balloon. last night CPM's 204279. Yes over two hundred thousand>
Current reading at 9:30 p.m March 21 is Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 179649.
To give you a better idea where it should be here are a few other locations;
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14<<<<<<<<<<
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31<<<<<<<<<<
As you can see modest CPM levels of 14 and 31> this is the average found at most monitor locations.
NO OTHER LOCATION HAS TOPPED 100 Never Mind 200,000
SO Why is Raleigh reading 6 digits?
Tara Fagan Gattis Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:37 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:23:44 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 182335
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4819
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2757
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 753
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 420
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 263
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 197
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 58
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75
3 hours ago • Like
Tara Fagan Gattis Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 02:24:00 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 03:24:08 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): N/A
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4721
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2753
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 749
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 415
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 262
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 297
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 206
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 59
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75
I have been making calls all day and been given the run around, Emails, phone numbers that require names just to access and leave a voice
mail, I called EPA, sent emails to EPA Radnet desk, left message for Lee Cox (out of office) Rick Buttons (Back in office March 21st message said) even called the NC emergency response number, what a joke that was. I tried to explain to the girl that the CPM's over Raleigh were over 200,000 You know what she said?
Well ma'am we do have 3 Nuclear plants>
I said yeah I know that's why I'm calling<
tried to tell her normal levels aren't supposed to go over 130 CPM,
tried to tell her my main concern was that one of those nuclear plants, the Shearon Harris reactor, was JUST restarted recently with parts from the 3 Mile Island Reactor>
Then she says radiation is not her area of expertise, so I asked her to find me someone who was> She asked where I was I said GA., so she was like"well then why are you calling NC emergency response?" DUH! 1st number she gave me I had already called and left message Lee Cox> second number went to voice mail system, I have about 15 different numbers, and more emails, here that I have called, including Warren from NC Warn.org (left a message there too, told him to google the epa radnet interface and check NC> Something is going on there)
I feel like I am stuck in a poorly written movie. It has been IMPOSSIBLE to get a live knowledgable person to explain why Raleigh NC currently has a CPM level of 179649
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71See More
Sunday at 10:02pm
*******
Deb Paulsen
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
RadNet Map Interface
cdxnode64.epa.gov
This page displays the summary information of each monitor location. To view the summary information collected at the monitor location, please single-click on the icon of interest. Click here to view text version of the data by monitor location.
on Sunday · LikeUnlike · · Share · UnsubscribeSubscribe
*
*
Pamela Petty likes this.
*
o
Tara Fagan Gattis oh no!! these i saw were numbers in a circle lol!! i didn't see anything with numbers like that!!!! thank god...or i would have panicked lmao
March 20 at 10:13pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen WTF New map for me, but not much dif from the other, CPM readings correspond with other map> Except No North Carolina Monitor live on other link> what the hell is up with that North Carolina radiation reading> are you seeing it is this for real? Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
March 20 at 10:14pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen i'm gonna send link to my Air Force Brother, see what he thinks, if he is around
March 20 at 10:14pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol no Tara u were right with the round numbers this is a new access map I found>
March 20 at 10:18pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:27:40 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:27:47 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 15
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1721
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1002
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 293
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 128
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 72
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 41
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29See More
March 20 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen exactly 15 is normal this one is Raleigh NC
March 20 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen that's why I'm freaked over seeing 200,00+
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis this is what that showed me. when i accessed the above link...that is. and yeah...i thought it said 84...then i saw 64. made me think i was seeing things...had i not seen it sev times...i wouldn't have believed it lololol
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen gotta go on dark blue balloons to view monitor readouts for each state on this new map
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis is it tied to war ya think????? trying to understand all this lol.
March 20 at 10:22pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do gotta hit map reset top of page to get fresh data too
March 20 at 10:22pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen and I have no idea as far as last question but if we understand that reading right something is bad wrong there
March 20 at 10:23pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis here is what i found on cali...well sac i think. it is on the link you have.
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-sacramento-bg.html
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:10 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:16:19 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4761
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2660
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 727
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 386
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 282
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 192
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 56
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen BETA GROSS COUNT (CPM) 204279 has RISEN Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
March 20 at 10:27pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol seems to be sending you on goose chases lol
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis ROFLMAOOOOOOOOO! yes!!
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i think i did that though.
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen check out NC and then bounce around a few other states to get familiar with info, ONLY NC is insane> Everyone else comparable to the other radnet map
March 20 at 10:31pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis ok...gonna crash in a few. 5 am comes too soon around here and i was delayed with my med tonight so i'm gonna be lagging lol. will compare this when i wake to what is here now. see what it says. save this to pc incase fb takes it away ;) btw...it didn't pull up Ga for some reason?? well last time i checked.
March 20 at 10:33pm · UnlikeLike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 10:12:03 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:12:11 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 39
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 3944
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2244
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 688
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 340
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 230
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 335
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 106
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 80
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 131See More
March 20 at 10:35pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i'm posting for reference :)
March 20 at 10:35pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen nighty nite, me too:)
March 20 at 10:38pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71See More
March 21 at 10:29am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Not feeling so great today, but I am going to make an effort to discover what the deal is with this unreal high Beta Gross Count Rate reading of (CPM): 205378 for North Carolina> I have many members of my Marine corp family there
March 21 at 10:32am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Map
Satellite
Hybrid
...1000 mi
1000 km
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
Generally if I understand correctly these readings should be 100 or less to be considered normal> Guess Since it is Monday I will try calling the help desk numberSee More
March 21 at 10:43am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
in regards to excessive CPM levels noted in North Carolina I did call the number available on the site, but was told it is only in regards to assistance with technical matters of site operation, and was given an e mail address to send my co...ncerns to. this is the communication in it's entirety that I forwarded to the EPA.
Hello I do not possess a scientific degree in this area of expertise. I am an interested average American citizen. In view of the current situation in Japan I began monitoring a number of available radiation networks, and again while not an expert have grasped the basics of the data presented therein. What initially began as a search for information regarding radiation reports from Japan (Which at this point in my opinion I would agree that levels have been negligible thus far) has progressed to also tracking some very regular puzzling spikes coming out of Denver, (Interest peaked and puzzling because no active nuclear plants are listed in this vicinity that I know of, except the infamous Rocky Flats location), and again as I said spikes, but nothing that set off "alarms" so to speak. Denver levels screen captured thus far have only peaked as high as 84 that I have seen. My concern is in regards to North Carolina, and it is this data that has me sending this inquiry.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
Today reading shows slight decrease
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:19:10 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:19:18 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 184600
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4708
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2625
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 722
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 384
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 283
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 55
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74
My concern is in comparison with data to other locations. I am reading data correctly, as it is my understanding that normal value CPM levels should be 100- 130 or under.
COMPARED WITH WILMINGTON NC:
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1603
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 951
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 126
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 67
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 42
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29
COMPARED WITH CHARLOTTE, NC
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2025
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1263
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 360
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 100
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 53
There are also corresponding spikes out of Colorado that have exceeded 100CPM
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
I have forwarded this Information and would greatly appreciate any information you may offer regarding these elevated readings.
Thank You very much,
Sincerely Yours,
Debra Paulsen
minus my phone number and email addresssSee More
March 21 at 1:54pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 04:19:36 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 05:19:45 PM
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 167850
going down very slowly, this was yesterday, Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634 ,See More
March 21 at 3:07pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:16:01 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:16:09 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 229 Colorado still reading higher than it should as well
March 21 at 3:08pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen
1 Hour ago Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 167850
Update: ...
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 05:19:49 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 06:19:57 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 170108See More
March 21 at 4:12pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:20:15 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:20:23 p.m.
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 171221See More
March 21 at 5:54pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Map
Satellite
Hybrid
...1000 mi
1000 km
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:20:27 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 09:20:35 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 155092See More
March 21 at 6:42pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I have called the EPA, Lee Cox at the NC Radiation protection dept., and have been able to only leave messages and emails.
March 21 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I mean seriously what do they have a monitor in the stack of the Shearon Harris Nuclear plant? The Shearon Harris Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant with a single Westinghouse designed pressurized-water nuclear reactor operated by Progress Energy. Located in New Hill, North Carolina, in the United States, about 20 miles (30 km) southwest of Raleigh,
March 21 at 10:23pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I mean this story that I can't get anyone to answer my question " why does Raleigh NC radiation Monitor show 6 digit CPM output when the Normal alarm rate is 100 - 130 ?" http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/6864151/
March 21 at 10:27pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Just gets better and better, or worse and worse I guess you could say MIDDLETOWN, Pa. — A generator in storage for more than three decades following the accident at Three Mile Island nuclear power plant is heading to North Carolina. Officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission say the electrical generator from the damaged Unit 2 reactor at TMI will be used at Progress Energy Inc.'s Shearon Harris nuclear plant in southwest Wake County.
March 21 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen On January 22, 2010 officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the electrical generator from the damaged Unit 2 reactor at Three Mile Island will be used at Shearon Harris. [5] The generator was refurbished and installed during a refueling outage in November, 2010.
March 21 at 10:29pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen oh so it has been up and running with parts from three mile island nuclear reactor for about what 2-3 months? Man this is real scary shit
March 21 at 10:30pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 11:23:25 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:33 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 189877
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4842
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2770
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 754
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 417
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 271
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 202
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 57
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
Tuesday at 9:24am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Yeah you got it girl>>> This is the puppy
Tuesday at 10:14am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Working on getting this information passed around the base, hoping one of my Marines will know someone high enough to pass this info along> Cause NOBODY I have called or emailed has taken me seriously and I was run all over yesterday, I finally filed an officil emergency response violation form last night
Tuesday at 10:16am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis hey..did you get a friend request from tara wheelus? if not, find her on my friend's list and friend her. she cannot send out any requests due to being punished by fb for trying to add new friends she knew. jerks!!
Tuesday at 10:16am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol yeah don't say the dirty word (FB) been having some major problems lol myself> Haha. Can you believe this shit though ? Normal range is 5 - 60 CPM and Raleigh is putting out 6 figures> Crazy
Tuesday at 10:18am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
btw...it is showing a light blue pin now. here are the results as of a sec ago:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:37 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:23:44 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM...): 182335
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4819
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2757
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 753
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 420
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 263
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 197
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 58
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 10:18am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis what do you think it is??? i don't understand what is going on but it is higher compared to others i have watched.
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen yeah I can no longer access site at all, catch what you can they're not letting me in< Light blue > They're gonna shut it down soon> thanks for the current reading:)
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen The Shearon Harris NUKE PLANT is my guess
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen They put USED THREE MILE ISLAND PARTS IN IT JUST A COUPLE MONTHS AGO
Tuesday at 10:21am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis that's what i was thinking from what i was able to read/understand from your posts and links. so basically they are uusing stuff from a partial meltdown there?!
Tuesday at 10:21am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i told mitch about this. he remembered that incident.
Tuesday at 10:22am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen yeah and they no doubt know about these levels
Tuesday at 10:23am · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen Since I cannot access > I get access denied, and Unable to connect to server and service temporarily unavailable blah blah blah> If you can check levels a few times today and post here
Tuesday at 10:24am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i will. it is totally denying you??? wtf?!!!!!! ok..i will and if you see me on here and notice i haven't...remind me. i am also searching on campaign money trail too. seems barack supporters like qadaffi money...a lot!
Tuesday at 10:26am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:37 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:23:44 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 182335
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4819
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2757
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 753
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 420
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 263
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 197
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 58
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 10:47am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis same as a while ago.......anyway!
Tuesday at 10:48am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 02:24:00 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 03:24:08 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): N/A
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4721
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2753
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 749
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 415
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 262
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 297
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 206
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 59
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 1:06pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Well I finally have my computer back up, give me a little bit and I will update with additional information... Surprisingly my telephone has begun to ring today. Going to print out some stuff (only way to really keep anything for sure latel...y) and then I will be back. Oh and Tara, thanks so much for the last data capture with the light blue balloon Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 182335, just before the monitor was taken offline:) I am not supposed to say much, in fact when I return I only have 1 quote that has been "approved", but in my own humble opinion I "think" (cannot quote) that the reading taken at the point the balloon icon was light blue was a deployable monitor, after that one read high, data has been unavailable at all from the Raleigh NC location. I am not overly concerned it is unavailable because I feel that we can at least rest assured that we have accomplished what was needed, and that is that the situation is being looked at.Be back soon:)See More
Tuesday at 2:17pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis FANTASTIC!! i was wondering if something happened due to the fact the readings kept keing the exact same every time i clicked them....that explains then...right?? you go, woman!!!!! i am VERY proud of the hard work you did trying to get those assholes to listen :))))))))))))))))) (big smiles)
Tuesday at 4:42pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen http://www.radiationnetwork.com/ has added a NC Monitor> after all the ruckus> that should prove helpful, glad they did that.
Tuesday at 10:59pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Current NC CPM's Via this one MUCH more in the realm one would expect.
Tuesday at 11:00pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Took away two of the Denver monitors though, so perhaps as I suggested someone mobile has gone to check it out and is monitoring, I like this site because it is private individuals
Tuesday at 11:02pm · LikeUnlike · 2 peopleLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen I did send Mineral Labs that runs the site an email thanking them for acting so promptly to get a monitor up there for us:)
Tuesday at 11:07pm · LikeUnlike · 2 peopleLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen
remember the statement it was due to Rf disruptions and the monitor was fine? well got another email today (typing skipping, hanging up already what a nuisance ) any way so yea we do have some clues to a BIG antenna being in use at this loc...ation (maybe GWEN working w/ HAARP who knows) but gotta be pretty big to set of the levels we saw> Here is the newest email from The EPA themselves> remember Patrick Cox said I could quote the EPA and say it was due to RF disruption/interferrence> Questions_Radiation@epamail.epa.gov to Debbie Paulsen
Mar 23
Thank you for contacting the Radiation Protection Division.
The beta detector on the Raleigh, NC RadNet fixed monitor is
experiencing technical difficulties, which has resulted in erroneous
data being reported on EPA's RadNet website. The gamma monitor is still
reporting accurate data. Gamma data helps scientists determine the type
of radioactive material present in the air. As is true with all of our
fixed RadNet monitors nationwide, the Raleigh monitor shows typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern. Until the issue is resolved, EPA will suspend
posting of the beta data to avoid confusion.
Thank you.
Angela Shogren
Radiation Protection Division
From: Debbie Paulsen
To: Questions Radiation@EPA, paaatriot101@
Date: 03/21/2011 01:49 PM
Subject: High CPM data from North Carolina
- Show quoted text - HMMMMMMMMMMMM still of interest>See More
18 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personPamela Petty likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen lol out of 64 comments only these few remain> whatever> copied and saved them and PRINTED them all allready Just makes things more interesting:) anyway latest update continuing this story> to follow as I bump this back to the top of the page> maybe after they see I mentioned all of the missing comments they will put them back> I have invited a few people to visit
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen NOPE> we have only 4 Comments remaining>
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Any way I invited the reporter that broke this story (That we started no doubt) to come here and view correspondances http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/some-radiation-tracking-air-monitors-may-not-be-working-properly-epa-says.html
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
paaatriot101@gmail.com to jsnyder24@bloomberg.net
1:47pm
Hi,
Debra Paulsen here, Paaatriot101> I began this story, went all the way to National Response Level with it over the 6 digit 200,000 plus readings coming from Raleigh NC. I have all co...mmunications openly posted on my face book group page
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_207618339250155&ap=1
Big story ongoing> Ever heard of HAARP?
Feel free to contact, lol as long as I can keep the computer up and running, bit inconvenient, have a few, and there is always the public computers at the library, might want to put your boots on though if you're new to the world of Conspiracy Theorist lol, cause the shit is deep, but most of it is very real and smells terrible.
Peace Out
Debbie P
One American:)See More
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen will be reposting some of the missing data here for a while> for everyone that commented and you no longer see your posts I am sorry all I can say is its not me editing what we say here, most of my shits missing too> Only dif is, I still got mine
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen okay just so you guys know the microsoft saved docs with the radiation monitor readings> Have all been deleted from site> My Microsoft word docs that they were saved to are corrupted and cannot be opened, but... Gues what lol I PRINTED SOME> remember I posted that the other day< Only way to keep it is to print it> so later yes I will scan and get some of our captured missing data back up here.
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
I also emailed a lot to myself> radiation.questions@epa.gov
Hello I do not possess a scientific degree in this area of expertise. I am an interested average American citizen. In view of the current situation in Japan I began monitoring a num...ber of available radiation networks, and again while not an expert have grasped the basics of the data presented therein. What initially began as a search for information regarding radiation reports from Japan (Which at this point in my opinion I would agree that levels have been negligible thus far) has progressed to also tracking some very regular puzzling spikes coming out of Denver, (Interest peaked and puzzling because no active nuclear plants are listed in this vicinity that I know of, except the infamous Rocky Flats location), and again as I said spikes, but nothing that set off "alarms" so to speak. Denver levels screen captured thus far have only peaked as high as 84 that I have seen. My concern is in regards to North Carolina, and it is this data that has me sending this inquiry.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
Today reading shows slight decrease
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:19:10 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:19:18 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 184600
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4708
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2625
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 722
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 384
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 283
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 55
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74
My concern is in comparison with data to other locations. I am reading data correctly, as it is my understanding that normal value CPM levels should be 100- 130 or under.
COMPARED WITH WILMINGTON NC:
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1603
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 951
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 126
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 67
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 42
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29
COMPARED WITH CHARLOTTE, NC
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2025
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1263
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 360
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 100
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 53
There are also corresponding spikes out of Colorado that have exceeded 100CPM
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
I have forwarded this Information and would greatly appreciate any information you may offer regarding these elevated readings.
Thank You very much,
Sincerely Yours,
Debra Paulsen
one American
I may be contacted by phone 706-672-3791 or email at PaaatRiot101@gmail.com
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Reply
|
Questions_Radiation@epamail.epa.gov
to me
show details Mar 23 (2 days ago)
Thank you for contacting the Radiation Protection Division.
The beta detector on the Raleigh, NC RadNet fixed monitor is
experiencing technical difficulties, which has resulted in erroneous
data being reported on EPA's RadNet website. The gamma monitor is still
reporting accurate data. Gamma data helps scientists determine the type
of radioactive material present in the air. As is true with all of our
fixed RadNet monitors nationwide, the Raleigh monitor shows typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern. Until the issue is resolved, EPA will suspend
posting of the beta data to avoid confusion.
Thank you.
Angela Shogren
Radiation Protection Division
From: Debbie Paulsen
To: Questions Radiation@EPA, paaatriot101@gmail.com
Date: 03/21/2011 01:49 PM
Subject: High CPM data from North Carolina
- Show quoted text -See More
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen sure glad I printed the other day though cause its kinda funny how my printer isn't working today > you know what else is funny? besides the skippy sticky typing ? My computer is online I'm here, but my router is telling me I am not online:)
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol comment counter says we have 72 comments here.. anyway
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
This was the highest level we caught, as mentioned comments erased> but I printed out most> give me a little time will get the shit back up> They wiped out word file copies> if they go to this effort then the info must be worth something
onl...y staying on a minute> getting things in order and I have to scan everything I had printed out to put it back up here:
This ain't my 1st rodeo> Sensitive documents> if you want them print them> email all over the place etc...
Deb Paulsen https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do gotta hit map reset top of page to get fresh data too
Sunday at 10:22pm
Deb Paulsen
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:10 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:16:19 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4761
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2660
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 727
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 386
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 282
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 192
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 56
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
Sunday at 10:26pmSee More
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen anyone notice they didn't take away the monitor readings we had up here until we started mentioning HAARP?
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen ROTFLMAO look most of the comments are back< haha too freagin funny:)
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen looks like the only thing I might have to scan to repost (at the moment) will be the email communications > I got them printed too:)
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen f@#$ them moving shit over to my blog> don't have time to play games > will post a link shortly> then anyone that is here to view ALL of the exchange will have NO MORE problems.
5 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
*
Write a comment...**************************
Deb Paulsen
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
RadNet Map Interface
cdxnode64.epa.gov
This page displays the summary information of each monitor location. To view the summary information collected at the monitor location, please single-click on the icon of interest. Click here to view text version of the data by monitor location.
on Sunday · LikeUnlike · · Share · UnsubscribeSubscribe
*
*
Pamela Petty likes this.
*
o
Tara Fagan Gattis oh no!! these i saw were numbers in a circle lol!! i didn't see anything with numbers like that!!!! thank god...or i would have panicked lmao
March 20 at 10:13pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen WTF New map for me, but not much dif from the other, CPM readings correspond with other map> Except No North Carolina Monitor live on other link> what the hell is up with that North Carolina radiation reading> are you seeing it is this for real? Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
March 20 at 10:14pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen i'm gonna send link to my Air Force Brother, see what he thinks, if he is around
March 20 at 10:14pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol no Tara u were right with the round numbers this is a new access map I found>
March 20 at 10:18pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:27:40 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:27:47 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 15
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1721
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1002
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 293
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 128
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 72
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 41
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29See More
March 20 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen exactly 15 is normal this one is Raleigh NC
March 20 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen that's why I'm freaked over seeing 200,00+
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis this is what that showed me. when i accessed the above link...that is. and yeah...i thought it said 84...then i saw 64. made me think i was seeing things...had i not seen it sev times...i wouldn't have believed it lololol
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen gotta go on dark blue balloons to view monitor readouts for each state on this new map
March 20 at 10:21pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis is it tied to war ya think????? trying to understand all this lol.
March 20 at 10:22pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do gotta hit map reset top of page to get fresh data too
March 20 at 10:22pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen and I have no idea as far as last question but if we understand that reading right something is bad wrong there
March 20 at 10:23pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis here is what i found on cali...well sac i think. it is on the link you have.
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-sacramento-bg.html
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:10 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:16:19 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4761
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2660
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 727
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 386
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 282
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 192
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 56
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
March 20 at 10:26pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen BETA GROSS COUNT (CPM) 204279 has RISEN Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
March 20 at 10:27pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol seems to be sending you on goose chases lol
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis ROFLMAOOOOOOOOO! yes!!
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i think i did that though.
March 20 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen check out NC and then bounce around a few other states to get familiar with info, ONLY NC is insane> Everyone else comparable to the other radnet map
March 20 at 10:31pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis ok...gonna crash in a few. 5 am comes too soon around here and i was delayed with my med tonight so i'm gonna be lagging lol. will compare this when i wake to what is here now. see what it says. save this to pc incase fb takes it away ;) btw...it didn't pull up Ga for some reason?? well last time i checked.
March 20 at 10:33pm · UnlikeLike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 10:12:03 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:12:11 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 39
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 3944
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2244
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 688
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 340
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 230
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 335
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 106
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 80
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 131See More
March 20 at 10:35pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i'm posting for reference :)
March 20 at 10:35pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen nighty nite, me too:)
March 20 at 10:38pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71See More
March 21 at 10:29am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Not feeling so great today, but I am going to make an effort to discover what the deal is with this unreal high Beta Gross Count Rate reading of (CPM): 205378 for North Carolina> I have many members of my Marine corp family there
March 21 at 10:32am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Map
Satellite
Hybrid
...1000 mi
1000 km
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
Generally if I understand correctly these readings should be 100 or less to be considered normal> Guess Since it is Monday I will try calling the help desk numberSee More
March 21 at 10:43am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
in regards to excessive CPM levels noted in North Carolina I did call the number available on the site, but was told it is only in regards to assistance with technical matters of site operation, and was given an e mail address to send my co...ncerns to. this is the communication in it's entirety that I forwarded to the EPA.
Hello I do not possess a scientific degree in this area of expertise. I am an interested average American citizen. In view of the current situation in Japan I began monitoring a number of available radiation networks, and again while not an expert have grasped the basics of the data presented therein. What initially began as a search for information regarding radiation reports from Japan (Which at this point in my opinion I would agree that levels have been negligible thus far) has progressed to also tracking some very regular puzzling spikes coming out of Denver, (Interest peaked and puzzling because no active nuclear plants are listed in this vicinity that I know of, except the infamous Rocky Flats location), and again as I said spikes, but nothing that set off "alarms" so to speak. Denver levels screen captured thus far have only peaked as high as 84 that I have seen. My concern is in regards to North Carolina, and it is this data that has me sending this inquiry.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
Today reading shows slight decrease
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:19:10 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:19:18 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 184600
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4708
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2625
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 722
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 384
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 283
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 55
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74
My concern is in comparison with data to other locations. I am reading data correctly, as it is my understanding that normal value CPM levels should be 100- 130 or under.
COMPARED WITH WILMINGTON NC:
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1603
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 951
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 126
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 67
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 42
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29
COMPARED WITH CHARLOTTE, NC
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2025
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1263
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 360
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 100
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 53
There are also corresponding spikes out of Colorado that have exceeded 100CPM
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
I have forwarded this Information and would greatly appreciate any information you may offer regarding these elevated readings.
Thank You very much,
Sincerely Yours,
Debra Paulsen
minus my phone number and email addresssSee More
March 21 at 1:54pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 04:19:36 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 05:19:45 PM
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 167850
going down very slowly, this was yesterday, Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634 ,See More
March 21 at 3:07pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:16:01 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:16:09 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 229 Colorado still reading higher than it should as well
March 21 at 3:08pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen
1 Hour ago Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 167850
Update: ...
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 05:19:49 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 06:19:57 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 170108See More
March 21 at 4:12pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:20:15 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:20:23 p.m.
...Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 171221See More
March 21 at 5:54pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Map
Satellite
Hybrid
...1000 mi
1000 km
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:20:27 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 09:20:35 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 155092See More
March 21 at 6:42pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I have called the EPA, Lee Cox at the NC Radiation protection dept., and have been able to only leave messages and emails.
March 21 at 10:20pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I mean seriously what do they have a monitor in the stack of the Shearon Harris Nuclear plant? The Shearon Harris Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant with a single Westinghouse designed pressurized-water nuclear reactor operated by Progress Energy. Located in New Hill, North Carolina, in the United States, about 20 miles (30 km) southwest of Raleigh,
March 21 at 10:23pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen I mean this story that I can't get anyone to answer my question " why does Raleigh NC radiation Monitor show 6 digit CPM output when the Normal alarm rate is 100 - 130 ?" http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/6864151/
March 21 at 10:27pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Just gets better and better, or worse and worse I guess you could say MIDDLETOWN, Pa. — A generator in storage for more than three decades following the accident at Three Mile Island nuclear power plant is heading to North Carolina. Officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission say the electrical generator from the damaged Unit 2 reactor at TMI will be used at Progress Energy Inc.'s Shearon Harris nuclear plant in southwest Wake County.
March 21 at 10:28pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen On January 22, 2010 officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the electrical generator from the damaged Unit 2 reactor at Three Mile Island will be used at Shearon Harris. [5] The generator was refurbished and installed during a refueling outage in November, 2010.
March 21 at 10:29pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen oh so it has been up and running with parts from three mile island nuclear reactor for about what 2-3 months? Man this is real scary shit
March 21 at 10:30pm · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 11:23:25 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:33 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 189877
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4842
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2770
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 754
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 417
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 271
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 202
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 57
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
Tuesday at 9:24am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Yeah you got it girl>>> This is the puppy
Tuesday at 10:14am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Working on getting this information passed around the base, hoping one of my Marines will know someone high enough to pass this info along> Cause NOBODY I have called or emailed has taken me seriously and I was run all over yesterday, I finally filed an officil emergency response violation form last night
Tuesday at 10:16am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis hey..did you get a friend request from tara wheelus? if not, find her on my friend's list and friend her. she cannot send out any requests due to being punished by fb for trying to add new friends she knew. jerks!!
Tuesday at 10:16am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol yeah don't say the dirty word (FB) been having some major problems lol myself> Haha. Can you believe this shit though ? Normal range is 5 - 60 CPM and Raleigh is putting out 6 figures> Crazy
Tuesday at 10:18am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
btw...it is showing a light blue pin now. here are the results as of a sec ago:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:37 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:23:44 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM...): 182335
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4819
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2757
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 753
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 420
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 263
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 197
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 58
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 10:18am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis what do you think it is??? i don't understand what is going on but it is higher compared to others i have watched.
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen yeah I can no longer access site at all, catch what you can they're not letting me in< Light blue > They're gonna shut it down soon> thanks for the current reading:)
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen The Shearon Harris NUKE PLANT is my guess
Tuesday at 10:20am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen They put USED THREE MILE ISLAND PARTS IN IT JUST A COUPLE MONTHS AGO
Tuesday at 10:21am · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis that's what i was thinking from what i was able to read/understand from your posts and links. so basically they are uusing stuff from a partial meltdown there?!
Tuesday at 10:21am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i told mitch about this. he remembered that incident.
Tuesday at 10:22am · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen yeah and they no doubt know about these levels
Tuesday at 10:23am · LikeUnlike · 1 personTara Fagan Gattis likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen Since I cannot access > I get access denied, and Unable to connect to server and service temporarily unavailable blah blah blah> If you can check levels a few times today and post here
Tuesday at 10:24am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis i will. it is totally denying you??? wtf?!!!!!! ok..i will and if you see me on here and notice i haven't...remind me. i am also searching on campaign money trail too. seems barack supporters like qadaffi money...a lot!
Tuesday at 10:26am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 12:23:37 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:23:44 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 182335
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4819
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2757
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 753
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 420
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 263
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 298
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 197
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 58
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 10:47am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis same as a while ago.......anyway!
Tuesday at 10:48am · LikeUnlike
o
Tara Fagan Gattis
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/22/2011 02:24:00 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/22/2011 03:24:08 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): N/A
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4721
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2753
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 749
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 415
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 262
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 297
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 206
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 59
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 75See More
Tuesday at 1:06pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
Well I finally have my computer back up, give me a little bit and I will update with additional information... Surprisingly my telephone has begun to ring today. Going to print out some stuff (only way to really keep anything for sure latel...y) and then I will be back. Oh and Tara, thanks so much for the last data capture with the light blue balloon Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 182335, just before the monitor was taken offline:) I am not supposed to say much, in fact when I return I only have 1 quote that has been "approved", but in my own humble opinion I "think" (cannot quote) that the reading taken at the point the balloon icon was light blue was a deployable monitor, after that one read high, data has been unavailable at all from the Raleigh NC location. I am not overly concerned it is unavailable because I feel that we can at least rest assured that we have accomplished what was needed, and that is that the situation is being looked at.Be back soon:)See More
Tuesday at 2:17pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Tara Fagan Gattis FANTASTIC!! i was wondering if something happened due to the fact the readings kept keing the exact same every time i clicked them....that explains then...right?? you go, woman!!!!! i am VERY proud of the hard work you did trying to get those assholes to listen :))))))))))))))))) (big smiles)
Tuesday at 4:42pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen http://www.radiationnetwork.com/ has added a NC Monitor> after all the ruckus> that should prove helpful, glad they did that.
Tuesday at 10:59pm · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen Current NC CPM's Via this one MUCH more in the realm one would expect.
Tuesday at 11:00pm · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Took away two of the Denver monitors though, so perhaps as I suggested someone mobile has gone to check it out and is monitoring, I like this site because it is private individuals
Tuesday at 11:02pm · LikeUnlike · 2 peopleLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen I did send Mineral Labs that runs the site an email thanking them for acting so promptly to get a monitor up there for us:)
Tuesday at 11:07pm · LikeUnlike · 2 peopleLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen
remember the statement it was due to Rf disruptions and the monitor was fine? well got another email today (typing skipping, hanging up already what a nuisance ) any way so yea we do have some clues to a BIG antenna being in use at this loc...ation (maybe GWEN working w/ HAARP who knows) but gotta be pretty big to set of the levels we saw> Here is the newest email from The EPA themselves> remember Patrick Cox said I could quote the EPA and say it was due to RF disruption/interferrence> Questions_Radiation@epamail.epa.gov to Debbie Paulsen
Mar 23
Thank you for contacting the Radiation Protection Division.
The beta detector on the Raleigh, NC RadNet fixed monitor is
experiencing technical difficulties, which has resulted in erroneous
data being reported on EPA's RadNet website. The gamma monitor is still
reporting accurate data. Gamma data helps scientists determine the type
of radioactive material present in the air. As is true with all of our
fixed RadNet monitors nationwide, the Raleigh monitor shows typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern. Until the issue is resolved, EPA will suspend
posting of the beta data to avoid confusion.
Thank you.
Angela Shogren
Radiation Protection Division
From: Debbie Paulsen
To: Questions Radiation@EPA, paaatriot101@
Date: 03/21/2011 01:49 PM
Subject: High CPM data from North Carolina
- Show quoted text - HMMMMMMMMMMMM still of interest>See More
18 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personPamela Petty likes this.
o
Deb Paulsen lol out of 64 comments only these few remain> whatever> copied and saved them and PRINTED them all allready Just makes things more interesting:) anyway latest update continuing this story> to follow as I bump this back to the top of the page> maybe after they see I mentioned all of the missing comments they will put them back> I have invited a few people to visit
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen NOPE> we have only 4 Comments remaining>
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen Any way I invited the reporter that broke this story (That we started no doubt) to come here and view correspondances http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/some-radiation-tracking-air-monitors-may-not-be-working-properly-epa-says.html
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
paaatriot101@gmail.com to jsnyder24@bloomberg.net
1:47pm
Hi,
Debra Paulsen here, Paaatriot101> I began this story, went all the way to National Response Level with it over the 6 digit 200,000 plus readings coming from Raleigh NC. I have all co...mmunications openly posted on my face book group page
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_207618339250155&ap=1
Big story ongoing> Ever heard of HAARP?
Feel free to contact, lol as long as I can keep the computer up and running, bit inconvenient, have a few, and there is always the public computers at the library, might want to put your boots on though if you're new to the world of Conspiracy Theorist lol, cause the shit is deep, but most of it is very real and smells terrible.
Peace Out
Debbie P
One American:)See More
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen will be reposting some of the missing data here for a while> for everyone that commented and you no longer see your posts I am sorry all I can say is its not me editing what we say here, most of my shits missing too> Only dif is, I still got mine
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen okay just so you guys know the microsoft saved docs with the radiation monitor readings> Have all been deleted from site> My Microsoft word docs that they were saved to are corrupted and cannot be opened, but... Gues what lol I PRINTED SOME> remember I posted that the other day< Only way to keep it is to print it> so later yes I will scan and get some of our captured missing data back up here.
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
I also emailed a lot to myself> radiation.questions@epa.gov
Hello I do not possess a scientific degree in this area of expertise. I am an interested average American citizen. In view of the current situation in Japan I began monitoring a num...ber of available radiation networks, and again while not an expert have grasped the basics of the data presented therein. What initially began as a search for information regarding radiation reports from Japan (Which at this point in my opinion I would agree that levels have been negligible thus far) has progressed to also tracking some very regular puzzling spikes coming out of Denver, (Interest peaked and puzzling because no active nuclear plants are listed in this vicinity that I know of, except the infamous Rocky Flats location), and again as I said spikes, but nothing that set off "alarms" so to speak. Denver levels screen captured thus far have only peaked as high as 84 that I have seen. My concern is in regards to North Carolina, and it is this data that has me sending this inquiry.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
Today reading shows slight decrease
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:19:10 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:19:18 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 184600
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4708
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2625
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 722
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 384
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 283
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 55
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74
My concern is in comparison with data to other locations. I am reading data correctly, as it is my understanding that normal value CPM levels should be 100- 130 or under.
COMPARED WITH WILMINGTON NC:
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1603
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 951
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 126
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 67
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 42
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29
COMPARED WITH CHARLOTTE, NC
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2025
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1263
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 360
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 100
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 53
There are also corresponding spikes out of Colorado that have exceeded 100CPM
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2958
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 883
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 414
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 287
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 374
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 114
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 128
I have forwarded this Information and would greatly appreciate any information you may offer regarding these elevated readings.
Thank You very much,
Sincerely Yours,
Debra Paulsen
one American
I may be contacted by phone 706-672-3791 or email at PaaatRiot101@gmail.com
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Reply
|
Questions_Radiation@epamail.epa.gov
to me
show details Mar 23 (2 days ago)
Thank you for contacting the Radiation Protection Division.
The beta detector on the Raleigh, NC RadNet fixed monitor is
experiencing technical difficulties, which has resulted in erroneous
data being reported on EPA's RadNet website. The gamma monitor is still
reporting accurate data. Gamma data helps scientists determine the type
of radioactive material present in the air. As is true with all of our
fixed RadNet monitors nationwide, the Raleigh monitor shows typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern. Until the issue is resolved, EPA will suspend
posting of the beta data to avoid confusion.
Thank you.
Angela Shogren
Radiation Protection Division
From: Debbie Paulsen
To: Questions Radiation@EPA, paaatriot101@gmail.com
Date: 03/21/2011 01:49 PM
Subject: High CPM data from North Carolina
- Show quoted text -See More
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen sure glad I printed the other day though cause its kinda funny how my printer isn't working today > you know what else is funny? besides the skippy sticky typing ? My computer is online I'm here, but my router is telling me I am not online:)
3 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen lol comment counter says we have 72 comments here.. anyway
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen
This was the highest level we caught, as mentioned comments erased> but I printed out most> give me a little time will get the shit back up> They wiped out word file copies> if they go to this effort then the info must be worth something
onl...y staying on a minute> getting things in order and I have to scan everything I had printed out to put it back up here:
This ain't my 1st rodeo> Sensitive documents> if you want them print them> email all over the place etc...
Deb Paulsen https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do gotta hit map reset top of page to get fresh data too
Sunday at 10:22pm
Deb Paulsen
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:10 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:16:19 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 209634
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4761
...Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2660
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 727
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 386
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 282
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 192
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 56
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 73See More
Sunday at 10:26pmSee More
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike
o
Deb Paulsen anyone notice they didn't take away the monitor readings we had up here until we started mentioning HAARP?
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen ROTFLMAO look most of the comments are back< haha too freagin funny:)
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen looks like the only thing I might have to scan to repost (at the moment) will be the email communications > I got them printed too:)
2 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personLoading...
o
Deb Paulsen f@#$ them moving shit over to my blog> don't have time to play games > will post a link shortly> then anyone that is here to view ALL of the exchange will have NO MORE problems.
2 minutes ago · Like
This particular map always seems to show an unusually high CPM reading near the bizarre NWO Denver Airport Complex... Interesting...
Yes I have screen captured up 84> Never busts the 100 CPM alarm level though, can't believe no input here on the over 200,000 CPM reading out of NC though, No experts on this site I guess, been banned from the other one long time now, was hoping for some input. I have called the EPA number onsite, but was told it was tech support for web issues, and was given an email address, to which I sent the following info:
Hello I do not possess a scientific degree in this area of expertise. I am an interested average American citizen. In view of the current situation in Japan I began monitoring a number of available radiation networks, and again while not an expert have grasped the basics of the data presented therein. What initially began as a search for information regarding radiation reports from Japan (Which at this point in my opinion I would agree that levels have been negligible thus far) has progressed to also tracking some very regular puzzling spikes coming out of Denver, (Interest peaked and puzzling because no active nuclear plants are listed in this vicinity that I know of, except the infamous Rocky Flats location), and again as I said spikes, but nothing that set off "alarms" so to speak. Denver levels screen captured thus far have only peaked as high as 84 that I have seen. My concern is in regards to North Carolina, and it is this data that has me sending this inquiry.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/20/2011 11:15:58 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:16:05 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 204279
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4762
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2648
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 385
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 54
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
**********************
RETRIEVED FROM ANOTHER FORUM ACCT WHERE I REPOSTED MY FACEBOOK ENTRIES
NC: RALEIGH
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:18:45 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:18:53 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 205378
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4725
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2611
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 726
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 375
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 252
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 281
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 71
Today reading shows slight decrease
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 02:19:10 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 03:19:18 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 184600
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4708
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2625
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 722
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 384
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 283
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 55
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74
My concern is in comparison with data to other locations. I am reading data correctly, as it is my understanding that normal value CPM levels should be 100- 130 or under.
COMPARED WITH WILMINGTON NC:
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: WILMINGTON
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:30:32 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:30:40 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 14
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1603
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 951
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 285
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 126
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 67
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 68
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 42
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 20
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 29
COMPARED WITH CHARLOTTE, NC
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: NC: CHARLOTTE
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 12:48:39 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 01:48:47 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 31
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2025
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1263
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 360
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 100
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 53
There are also corresponding spikes out of Colorado that have exceeded 100CPM
CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Map data ©2011 Europa Technologies, INEGI - Terms of Use
Monitor Information:
Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:15:01 AM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 11:15:09 AM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 272
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4969
Pretty crazy readings.
Paaatriot101:)
#http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocky_Flats_Plant
hmmmmmm only nuke facility listed for Denver is an old govt production plant closed in 92> very interesting 3 monitors here that spike VERY high ON A REGULAR basis>
Yesterday at 3:33pm ·
#
Deb Paulsen The Rocky Flats Plant was a United States nuclear weapons production facility near Denver, Colorado that operated from 1952 to 1992. It was under the control of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) until 1977, when it was replaced by the Department of Energy (DOE).
Yesterday at 3:33pm ·
Deb Paulsen Throughout the 1960s, the plant continued to enlarge and add buildings. The Sixties also brought more contamination to the site. In 1967, 3,500 barrels of plutonium-contaminated lubricants and solvents were stored on Pad 903. A large number of them were found to be leaking, and low-level contaminated soil was becoming wind-borne from this area. This pad was covered with gravel and paved over with asphalt in 1969
Yesterday at 3:35pm ·
Deb Paulsen
Insiders at the plant started to covertly inform the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about the unsafe conditions sometime in 1987. Late that year the FBI commenced clandestine flights of l...ight aircraft over the area and noticed that the incinerator was apparently being used late into the night. After several months of collecting evidence both from workers and via direct measurement, the FBI informed the DOE on June 6, 1989 that they wanted to meet to discuss a potential terrorist threat. When the DOE officers arrived, they were served with a search warrant. Simultaneously, the FBI and EPA raided the facility. They discovered numerous violations of federal anti-pollution laws, including massive contamination of water and soil. However, none of the original charges which led to the raid were substantiated. In 1992, Rockwell was charged with environmental crimes including violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Clean Water Act. Rockwell pled guilty and paid an $18.5 million fine. This was the largest fine for an environmental crime to that date.
Paaatriot101 Sorry to leave you all hanging very busy and hectic past couple days, and the computer crash that kept me down a lot of today did not help. Here is the latest updated information that I have to offer after actually taking it to the extent of contacting the National Emergency Response, EPA, and many others:
Well at this time I am officially concluding discussion regarding the 6 digit CPM data coming out of North Carolina's EPA radiation
monitoring station. We should all continue though to keep our eyes and ears open for any news tidbits that may, or may not come out in
the near future related to The Shearon Harris Nuclear facility.
I say concluding because number one the Raleigh Monitor in question has been taken offline, so we are no longer able to view the data, and when it comes back up the numbers will be similar.
Number two because I have received a call from an official representative. Patrick Cox called this morning from the Radiation Protection Services of The State of North Carolina (Not to be confused with Lee Cox of the EPA National Response who I also sent information to regarding this matter).
Our conversation began a bit stiffly, as you can well imagine, an old time conspiracy theorist in an actual conversation with a government
official about how there is nothing to be concerned about, all is well, etc... etc...
It did not help that I at first thought he was Lee Cox from the EPA, who I had sent an extensive E mail with ALL of the information I had
gathered. It was only as we continued speaking that he clarified he was not The EPA Cox that I had sent ALL info to, He was Patrick
Cox of the North Carolina radiation Protection services, and the only information he had to go by was the voice mail message that I had
left the day before regarding my concerns about data for CPM levels recorded at the EPA radiation Monitoring site in Raleigh North
Carolina showing levels in the range of 200,000 CPM +/-.
We spoke for quite some time, and it wasn't until I asked "Aren't you concerned about these levels in light of the fact that the Shearon
Harris Nuclear facility has recently been shut down and restarted with parts from the Three Mile Island reactor?"
The dead silence that greeted me spoke volumes. Turns out he did not know about that, and said so. It was at that point that I explained to him I thought he was the EPA guy> Patrick Cox, to whom I had sent all the info, with links, via e mail. We spoke a bit more to catch him up on the concerns I had regarding NC, we also discussed the Denver readings. I felt after that moment of silence like we were "really" talking.
I would like to think that hopefully he is one of the good guys, and told him so, but I also told him one never knows anymore, a lot of
people do bad things nowadays. I have to give him some credit because he did call call the EPA, which is what he should have done from his level in the command chain. He took the issue seriously enough to look into it, and that is what was important.
I did end up on the phone for quite some time, and told him that I greatly appreciated that he was taking the time to speak with me, and
for at least part of the conversation I think I talked to the real person, and not a mouthpiece reciting what he is told to say.
I have been told though that there is only one quote that I am allowed to make regarding the conversation, because our "conversation" is not for release to any media, news, or radio networks for broadcast purposes. This is the quote from the EPA > I was told
" The EPA is aware of the readings, and that it is because the radiation monitor at the Raleigh North Carolina location is affected by RF Frequencies in that area".
I asked "Are there other types of monitors that could be used to measure the beta count in that area that the results would not be affected by these RF frequencies? I was told "yes". I asked in light of the history and recent upgrades with the used 3 mile Island parts didn't he think it would be a good idea to use one of these other types of monitors to measure the beta counts then? I was told there are other monitors at the site. This is where the conversation got sticky and I was instructed about limitations regarding what I can say as a factual quote, etc, etc... What I wanted to know and was unable to get quotable responses to was
"who was responsible for these "other" Monitor stations near the plant?
Is the nuclear facility Monitoring itself?
At that point I know I was irritating and badgering the man, and knew I was going to have to change tactics because I was alienating what
may have been the slight rapport we had begun to establish. I asked him "don't you want to know what an independent source has to
say?" You know what he told me? He said that he was going to go out to that site himself with a monitor.
I asked him would he call me back after he did this? He is unsure when he will go (Not sure how far away he is) but he did say that when
he does... he will call me and let me know what the Beta Radiation CPM levels are.
So concludes our emergency drill from Paatriot101. I for one would be very happy to NOT hear of any issues cropping up at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Facility, but, at the same time, I will be looking for it. Is everything concluded to my satisfaction? Well maybe not, but I do feel at least we have some people that know more about the situation than we do on board, because I also received a call today from Rita Leetum with the nuclear energy watchdog group NCWarn.org. We had a long conversation and she thanked me on behalf of NCWARN for sharing the information, and I do feel we can rest a little more assured that they will stay on top of this from here on out. Do I buy the RF Frequency interference? Do You? Well for now I guess we will have to because this is the answer from the top:)
The term Radio Frequency (RF or rf) refers to the electromagnetic field that is generated when an alternating current is input to an antenna. This field, also called an RF field or radio wave,... can be used for wireless broadcasting and communications over a significant portion of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum -- from about 9 kilohertz (kHz) to thousands of gigahertz (GHz). This portion is referred to as the RF Spectrum. As the frequency is increased beyond the RF spectrum, electromagnetic energy takes the form of infrared (IR), visible light, ultraviolet (UV), X rays, and gamma rays. I know I did say closed, but, Again I end up interested. So, the guy is right when he said EPA said RF can skew results, heck RF signals can create the radiation detected, so sure it would play heck with radiation monitors.
The BETA radiation was and is the high number that drew interest, and The EPA said it was the RF Signals that are skewing the monitor readings, but according to this a STRONG RF signal can actually emit X-Rays and Gamma radiation, although not beta. I will say this much part of our conversation involved a tower, and when I asked "which" or "whose" tower, he was quick to correct and say that he did not say it was a specific tower. But if it were some kind of antenna near there putting out thousands of gigahertz (GHz), then it must really have some juice running through it.
Well Throws hands up in air. So is there a problem with a Nuclear plant, thus high Beta CPM readings? Is there a GWEN tower nearby working with HAARP? scratches head. Maybe a little of both going on?
I was told that if I followed the radiation monitoring site for at least a year I would see more of these spikes, Was that a clue perhaps? Don't know. Seems lately everything one way or another, no matter what is under discussion eventually swings back around to HAARP being involved though. Sigh...brain needs break...number 5 is alive, need more input need more input :)
The original Radnet site we were using has added an NC Monitor:) Well almost NC kind of on border between NC/SC> Bit far from location we were tracking, maybe I will email again and see if they can get closer to Raleigh, or maybe he is mobile and we will see closer readings from the Raleigh area tomorrow? That will be worth checking out > http://www.radiationnetwork.com/
current CPM from SC/NC Border a comfortable 30 currently.
